![]() The recipient will be left decrypting an alien-like text message of symbols and markings.Īn emoji can look different depending on the phone being used. EMOJI IN TEXTBAR SOFTWAREIf the phone's software doesn't support emojis, they won’t get them. ![]() Yes, most can but even a tech-minded person can have problems viewing an emoji on an outdated phone. You may ask yourself "Can all phones handle an emoji?". The next hurdle revolves around the smartphone itself. These types of restrictions set by the operators need to be taken into consideration before setting up the notification or campaign as the invoice can grow quickly. Yet we’ve had cases with Sprint in the United States where multipart messages can arrive out of order – which is due to Sprint not supporting concatenated SMS. ![]() Most smartphones and network carriers can handle multipart SMS messages and will wait for all of them to arrive, putting them in order, before displaying the message to the user. If you need more characters and would still like to use emojis, you can, but you’ll need to send it in multiple parts. So just by adding “see you soon” you’ve gone over the limit and are sending a multipart message that costs twice as much. This means that the message containing the emoji at the top is 57 characters long, but the message maximum length caps out at 70 characters. Wish to know more? Here's everything you need to know about SMS API providers! Using emojis in an SMS message reduces the character length limit to 70 characters (from 160) which can affect the SMS budget if you actually need the 160 characters to convey a single message. What is the long answer? - using emojis comes with cons and it's not as simple as sending a plain SMS text. A popular emoji can even rival media like pictures and links that we are used to seeing in messages. Young people speak the language of ease and emojis are a great way to target them. Emojis are a great way to connect with customers of all ages in the online world and there is usually an emoji for anything. Let's face it, our modern example is easier to digest and can also have a real impact on younger generations and even encourage a "tap".Īs a business, the number one priority is to target your demographic. Texting doesn't need to be boring and using a parcel emoji icon instead of writing the word "parcel" is a new and improved form of communicating to your users. Perhaps also include the capacity in the editor interface to toggle HTML editing off/on in the editor so that the admin doesnt necesarily have to get involved.Instead of getting the same old: “ Hi! I’m John from DHL. ![]() something perhaps that allowed us to create our own menu from a dropdown list in the admin section, and in doing so giving us the capacity to activate or disactivate funtions. Just a thought, echoing N Hansens comments above.The written word is so important in moodle I think it would be a wonderful feature if moodle gave us the capacity to be in control of the tools that are in the editor. EMOJI IN TEXTBAR HOW TOI know that the original HTMLarea code doesnt have emoticons, so I imagine it is an addon written by the creators of moodle, correct? (I raise my hat to you people!) or is it also based on open code?ĭoes anyone who worked on the code know how to exclude just one function from the editor? I've just realised that the editor is indeed based on HTMLarea, I've looked hard in 1.4 and cannot find anything like original HTMLarea 3 code, is this is a very adapted version of htmlarea? or is the javascript just well buried inside php files? I think I smell a feature request coming. that one does not want within one's site (sorry WP1!). I think this is a very good idea, because it is quite sophisticated and might confuse some kinds of users or allow students to use colors etc. That said, I do believe someone suggested that admins be given the ability to customize what options are available through the html editor. However, that smiley face will still remain on the html editor. You could remove all the smiley faces from your Moodle. ![]() If my users want to use the text versions, then they may, but I really find the yellow faces to lower things to a less sophisticated level than I want to create. Aren't there any English teachers out there who want their students to be able to learn to compose in proper English without resorting to smileys? I personally would like to be able to disable these ugly yellow faces myself. I am surprised that no one has complained about this being built in before. As students can choose to use smileys through the html editor. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |